Available for viewing are a total of
The Honorable Mari Parlade, Eighth Judicial District Court, Department A, Family Division, presiding over a calendar call. Attorney Sheila Tajbakhsh appeared on behalf of the Father. The Mother failed to appear. The Court strikes portions of pretrial memorandum and imposes attorney fee sanction. You can join as a member by clicking this link here: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJPb0hCUcufpuk7QhxVxwKA/join For inquiries, feel free to contact us through www.ournevadajudges.com
This is just my insight from being in the trenches for 18 years. I am not accusing any lawyer of doing something wrong, or anything that would amount to malpractice. Lawyers have their own style. Some may decide it isn't a good idea to show your cards too early. Others may need more time to develop the strategy, and aren't forced to make a decision just yet. In this bail hearing, I would have - and again - this is just my approach - "beefed up" the wafer-think bail motion, and included the Constitutional authorities and relevant Nevada case law allowing the judge to even reconsider her ruling, and at the very least, get all of this into the record for Judge Leavitt. In addition, the new lawyer for Chille looks like he is throwing Michael Mee "under the bus." The new lawyer mentioned how the "briefing" on the First Amendment "issues" should have been done. I remember Chille saying that Mee didn't do a good job, but that he liked him as a person. It was along those lines. Making these statements about your lawyer in public will make other lawyers shun working with Chille. Mee is a fine lawyer, and we don't know the arrangements that Chille wanted that blocked Mee from doing his job. However, Mee said the briefing was submitted on March 18, 2024, the day before trial. The DA got it in the morning of the trial. Mee didn't specifically mention any case authority during closing argument. Also, was it Chille's job to do this, since he apparently wanted to first chair the case? We really don't know. Further complicating this is that Mee appeared on the notice of appeal, which would undermine any arguments that he was "ineffective," and make it much harder to raise such an argument. The "goal" here - at least from my perspective - is to transform this "bail" hearing into a new briefing schedule, where the new lawyer includes what Mee had as case law and then adds it to the motion. Then, seek approval to postpone the hearing so that the DA could file a written opposition, and if the authorities are strong, give some credence to the idea that bail is appropriate if the conviction is at risk. In this hearing, the marching orders are simple: the DA must uphold the conviction; the Judge must stay consistent in her reasons for conviction; Chille's lawyer must try to build a stronger record for the appeal. As it stands, the Judge very easily affirmed the record of her decision. The new lawyer for Chille was understandably in a bind - he just got done with a murder case, and had a lot of information to deal with and very little time. Chille is always talking to the public, which makes a lawyer's job maddening. I wouldn't doubt that Chille was trying to run Mee, who I think is a fine lawyer, into a subservient role and not allowing him to really argue and defend the case. The DA was well-prepared, and held the line. The new lawyer go it wrong on thinking the Judge added extra time for Chille's outbursts. In any event, how a lawyer runs a case is their idea. It doesn't make me right and them wrong. They may want to hold back on their arguments at this time, and have a plan in the works that would maximize the chance for reversal. These are the types of battles that are drawn out everyday in the courtroom. I am not a Nevada lawyer and none of this is legal advice. Grab some popcorn. Do not rely on this information, and always hire a locally licensed attorney for any legal questions. No attorney client relationship is implied or expressed, and this information cannot be relied upon.
The Honorable Dee Butler, Eighth Judicial District Court, Department J, Family Division, presiding over a status check. Attorney Jim M Jimmerson appeared on behalf of the Mother. Father appeared in proper person. You can join as a member by clicking this link here: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJPb0hCUcufpuk7QhxVxwKA/join For inquiries, feel free to contact us through www.ournevadajudges.com
The Honorable Timothy Williams, Eighth Judicial District Court, Department 16, presiding over a hearing on motion for stay pending appeal. Attorneys Will Kemp and Theodore Parker on behalf of the Plaintiffs. Attorney Dan Polsenberg, Joe Reynolds, and Kelly Evans on behalf of Hanna Instruments. Attorney Michael Rawlings on behalf of Milwaukee Instruments. Case No. A-21-834485-B. The Court takes matter under advisement. You can join as a member by clicking this link here: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJPb0hCUcufpuk7QhxVxwKA/join For inquiries, feel free to contact us through www.ournevadajudges.com
The Honorable Joanna Kishner, Eighth Judicial District Court, Department 31, presiding over a hearing on summary judgment. Mr. Richt failed to appear. Attorney Brianna Switzler for other Plaintiffs. Attorney Chad Fears for Scientific Instruments. Attorney Christian Ogata for Milwaukee Instruments. Case No. A-21-831880-B. Motion granted. You can join as a member by clicking this link here: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJPb0hCUcufpuk7QhxVxwKA/join For inquiries, feel free to contact us through www.ournevadajudges.com
The Honorable Jennifer Schwartz, Eighth Judicial District Court, Department 17, presiding over confirmation of counsel. Deputy District Attorney Colleen Baharava appeared on behalf of the State. Defense Attorney Anthony Goldstein appeared on behalf of Mr. Bellisario. Case No. C-21-354165-1. The Court schedules evidentiary hearing. You can join as a member by clicking this link here: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJPb0hCUcufpuk7QhxVxwKA/join For inquiries, feel free to contact us through www.ournevadajudges.com
The Honorable Ann Zimmerman, Las Vegas Justice Court, Department 8, presiding over a hearing on bail. Deputy District Attorney Agnes Botelho appeared on behalf of the State. Defense Attorney Christopher Oram appeared on behalf of Mr. DeCastro. Case No. 23-CR-013015. Motion denied. You can join as a member by clicking this link here: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJPb0hCUcufpuk7QhxVxwKA/join For inquiries, feel free to contact us through www.ournevadajudges.com
The Honorable Stephen Bishop, Ely Justice Court, presiding over arraignment. Deputy District Attorney Melissa Brown appeared on behalf of the State of Nevada. The Defendant failed to appear. 24-CR-00026-7K. The Court declines to issue bench warrant and continues. You can join as a member by clicking this link here: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJPb0hCUcufpuk7QhxVxwKA/join For inquiries, feel free to contact us through www.ournevadajudges.com
Coverage will be provided from the Ely Justice Court, on March 28, 2024, of the matter of the State of Nevada vs Shawn Ashdown. At issue is whether a father is guilty of kidnapping after absconding with his 3-year old daughter. You can join as a member by clicking this link here: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJPb0hCUcufpuk7QhxVxwKA/join For inquiries, feel free to contact us through www.ournevadajudges.com
The Honorable Kathleen Drakulich, Second Judicial District Court, Department 1, presiding over sentencing. Appearing for the State is Deputy District Attorney Jeremy Reichenberg. Appearing for Ms. Mitchell is Defense Attorney Steve Evenson. Case No. CR22-4980. The Court hears argument, allocution, victim impact testimony, and continues. You can join as a member by clicking this link here: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJPb0hCUcufpuk7QhxVxwKA/join For inquiries, feel free to contact us through www.ournevadajudges.com
The Honorable Joanna Kishner, Eighth Judicial District Court, Department 31, presiding over a hearing on preliminary injunction. Attorney Michael Gayan for the State. Attorneys Timothy Hester, Tammy Paterson, and David Sneed for Meta Platforms Inc. Case No. A-24-886110-B. Parties present closing arguments. The Court orders limited discovery on the issue of personal jurisdiction. You can join as a member by clicking this link here: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJPb0hCUcufpuk7QhxVxwKA/join For inquiries, feel free to contact us through www.ournevadajudges.com
The Honorable Joe Hardy, Eighth Judicial District Court, Department 15, presiding over a hearing. Attorneys Theodore Parker and Eric Pepperman for Plaintiffs. Case No. A-21-831169-B. You can join as a member by clicking this link here: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJPb0hCUcufpuk7QhxVxwKA/join For inquiries, feel free to contact us through www.ournevadajudges.com
©2025 Our Nevada Judges, Inc.
Terms & ConditionsVersion: 3.11.1Privacy Policy
An NRS Chapter 82 non-profit corporation. Recognized by the IRS as a Section 501(c)(3) organization.