Photo of Henderson, William G
Henderson, Bill
legal  Henderson, William G
Eighth Judicial District Court
Dept.: R (Family Division)

District Court Judge

Error Rate: 43.75%18  / 14   

 Advertisement  Advertisement 
  • Elected District Court Judge to Dept. R (Family Division) of the Eighth Judicial District Court on Jan 5, 2009.
  • Served to completion on Jan 5, 2015.
  • Elected District Court Judge to Dept. R (Family Division) of the Eighth Judicial District Court on Jan 5, 2015.
  • Served to completion on Jan 4, 2021.
  • Elected District Court Judge to Dept. R (Family Division) of the Eighth Judicial District Court on Jan 4, 2021.
  • This term ends on Jan 4, 2027.
Thumbnail
Presiding
E.B., a Mother vs B.B., a Father
Hearing, Apr 21, 2023
24 0   582 views, 2 comments

The Honorable Bill Henderson, Eighth Judicial District Court, Department R, Family Division presiding over a hearing after remand. Attorney Amanda Roberts appeared on behalf of the Mother. The Father represented himself. The Court accepts stipulation on child support and alimony. You can join as a member by clicking this link here: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJPb0hCUcufpuk7QhxVxwKA/join For inquiries, feel free to contact us through www.ournevadajudges.com

Supreme Court logo
Case No: 86192
Supreme Court
Authored
Reversed
Jun 6, 2024
457 days since filing.

Filed Authored Opinion. "Reversed." Before: Stiglich/Pickering/Parraguirre. Author: Stiglich, J. Majority: Stiglich/Pickering/Parraguirre. 140 Nev. Adv. Opn. No. 37. B24-LS/KP/RP. (SC).

Supreme Court logo
Case No: 86578
Court Of Appeals
Unpublished
Affirmed In Part and Dismissed In Part
Apr 29, 2024
139 days since filing.

Filed Order Affirming in Part and Dismissing in Part. We dismiss Brian's untimely challenges to the decree of divorce. We conclude Brian fails to demonstrate the district court abused its discretion by adopting Rourong's proposed order. Accordingly, we conclude that Brian is not entitled to relief. COA-MG/BB/DW (COA)

Supreme Court logo
Case No: 85537
Court Of Appeals
Unpublished
Affirmed In Part and Reversed In Part
Aug 22, 2023
305 days since filing.

Filed Order Reversing in Part, Vacating in Part, and Remanding. "We reverse the district court's custody and parenting time decision and remand this matter for the court to reconsider its decision in accordance with the guidance set forth in Roe, and to fully and properly analyze and apply the best interest factors. We further reverse the arrearages determination for the reasons articulated above. Finally, because we reverse the district court's resolution of the custody and parenting time issue

Nginx
HTML 5
FacebookTwitter

©2024 Our Nevada Judges, Inc.

Terms & ConditionsVersion: 3.10.5Privacy Policy

An NRS Chapter 82  non-profit corporation. Recognized by the IRS as a Section 501(c)(3) organization.

YouTube
Comodo SSL
Angular