Photo of Sobel, Jeffrey D
Sobel, Jeffrey D
Eighth Judicial District Court
Dept.: 5
District Court Judge
Error Rate: 14.67%128  / 22   
 Advertisement  Advertisement 
  • Elected District Court Judge to Dept. 5 of the Eighth Judicial District Court on Jan 7, 1991.
  • Served to completion on Jan 6, 1997.
  • Elected District Court Judge to Dept. 5 of the Eighth Judicial District Court on Jan 6, 1997.
  • Served to completion on Dec 31, 2002.
Removal From Bench
Order Of Consent To Discipline
Commission On Judicial Discipline
Jul 26, 2005 pending appeal

For improper election-related conduct, including demanding more money from an attorney or an explanation as to why an opponent received disparately more; public censure and forever barred from serving appointive or elective judicial office.

Thumbnail
2002 Election
38.87% (102419 votes)
General Election
Nov 5, 2002

Incumbent

Ranked 2nd out of 2 candidates and lost.

Supreme Court logo
Case No: 43582
Supreme Court
Authored
Reversed
Sep 22, 2005
437 days since filing.

Filed Authored Opinion. "Reversed and remanded." Before Rose, Gibbons and Hardesty, JJ. Author: Hardesty, J. We concur: Rose and Gibbons, JJ. 121 Nev. Adv. Opn. No. 66. SNP05

Supreme Court logo
Case No: 40131
Supreme Court
Unpublished
Dismissed
Dec 13, 2004
837 days since filing.

Filed Order Dismissing Appeal. fn1[Although appellant Turnberry/Centra Sub, LLC, apparently was not involved in this matter at the time this appeal was filed, it now appears as the successor-in-interest to VVLV''s rights and claims and, therefore, is included in the dismissal of this appeal.] This court lacks jurisdiction and '' . . . we dismiss this appeal.'' fn11[We note that, for reasons next discussed, this dismissal does not affect any party''s right to appeal following a final judgment in the district court. Hallicrafters, 102 Nev. 526, 728 P.2d 441.] fn13[In this appeal, statements made by both appellants in the docketing statements and elsewhere, as pointed out above, have not been entirely accurate or devoid of misleading information. However, we recognize that many of these problems and the instigation of this jurisdictionally deficient appeal stemmed, at least in part, from the vagueness of the district court''s written orders. Although we decline respondents'' invitation to impose dismissal or cost sanctions at this time, we remind counsel of their obligation to provide this court with complete and accurate information in the docketing statement and all other papers submitted to this court, and caution counsel that any misleading information in future submittals may result in the imposition of sanctions.] NNP04-NB/DA/MG

Supreme Court logo
Case No: 40812
Supreme Court
Unpublished
Affirmed
Oct 5, 2004
622 days since filing.

Filed Order of Affirmance. "ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED." SNP04D-RR/WM/MD

Supreme Court logo
Case No: 39053
Supreme Court
Unpublished
Affirmed
Sep 2, 2004
966 days since filing.

Filed Order of Affirmance. "ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED." NNP04-NB/DA/MG

Supreme Court logo
Case No: 40629
Supreme Court
Unpublished
Affirmed
Sep 2, 2004
631 days since filing.

Filed Order of Affirmance. "ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED." NNP04-MS/NB/DA

Supreme Court logo
Case No: 39359
Supreme Court
Unpublished
Reversed
Aug 26, 2004
892 days since filing.

Filed Dispositional Order/Appeal. Order of Reversal and Remand. "We reverse the judgment of the district court and remand this matter to the district court with instructions to reinstate appellants'' complaint and to conduct an evidentiary hearing to determine if appellants have exhausted their administrative remedies, and if not, to allow exhaustion of their administrative remedies if appropriate." SNP04S-MS/RR/WM

Supreme Court logo
Case No: 39554
Supreme Court
Unpublished
Affirmed
Aug 25, 2004
849 days since filing.

Filed Order of Affirmance. "ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED." SNP04D-RR/WM/MD

Supreme Court logo
Case No: 39619
Supreme Court
Unpublished
Reversed
May 27, 2004
745 days since filing.

Filed Dispositional Order/Appeal. Order of Reversal and Remand. "We reverse the district court''s order denying Addison''s motion to compel arbitration and remand for further proceedings consistent with this order." SNP04D-RR/WM/MD

Sobel Caught Running Courtroom From Home
Las Vegas Review Journal   
May 20, 2007
Nginx
HTML 5
FacebookTwitter

©2025 Our Nevada Judges, Inc.

Terms & ConditionsVersion: 3.11.0Privacy Policy

An NRS Chapter 82  non-profit corporation. Recognized by the IRS as a Section 501(c)(3) organization.

YouTube
Comodo SSL
Angular