Photo of Lehman, Jack
Lehman, Jack
Eighth Judicial District Court
Dept.: 10
District Court Judge
Error Rate: 18.52%44  / 10   
 Advertisement  Advertisement 
  • Appointed District Court Judge to Dept. 10 of the Eighth Judicial District Court on Jan 7, 1988.
  • Served to completion on Jan 2, 1989.
  • Elected District Court Judge to Dept. 10 of the Eighth Judicial District Court on Jan 2, 1989.
  • Served to completion on Jan 7, 1991.
  • Elected District Court Judge to Dept. 10 of the Eighth Judicial District Court on Jan 7, 1991.
  • Served to completion on Jan 6, 1997.
  • Elected District Court Judge to Dept. 10 of the Eighth Judicial District Court on Jan 6, 1997.
  • Served to completion on Jan 6, 2003.
Lehman's Former Law Clerk Runs For District Court Dept. 5 Race
Las Vegas Review Journal   
Sep 24, 2020
Lehman Recognized For Service To Judiciary
Nevada Appeal 
Jul 25, 2018
Supreme Court logo
Case No: 46704
Supreme Court
Unpublished
Dismissed
Mar 30, 2006
58 days since filing.

Filed Order Dismissing Appeal. "ORDER this appeal DISMISSED." NNP06-MD/NB/RP

Supreme Court logo
Case No: 40055
Supreme Court
Unpublished
Dismissed
Jun 8, 2004
665 days since filing.

Filed Order Dismissing Appeal. Order Dismissing in Part, Affirming in Part, Reversing in Part, and Remanding. We have elected to consolidate these appeals for disposition. ''We dismiss the appeal in Docket No. 40055 as moot, we vacate the district court''s habitual criminal adjudication.'' ORDER the judgment of the district court in Docket No. 41162 AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED for proceedings consistent with this order. fn13[We have reviewed all documents that Ruffin has submitted in proper person to the clerk of this court in this matter, and we conclude that no relief based upon those submissions is warranted. To the extent that Ruffin has attempted to present claims or facts in those submissions which were not previously presented in the proceedings below, we have declined to consider them in the first instance. We express no view respecting the validity of the district court''s prior habitual criminal adjudication. This decision constitutes our final resolution of these matters. Any appeal from the district court''s decision on remand shall be docketed as a new and separate matter.] SNP04S-MS/RR/WM. Nos. 40055/41162.

Supreme Court logo
Case No: 40276
Supreme Court
Unpublished
Affirmed
Feb 18, 2004
510 days since filing.

Filed Order of Affirmance. We conclude that Decarolis is not entitled to relief and that briefing and oral argument are unwarranted. "ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED." fn18[We have considered all proper person documents filed or received in this matter, and we conclude that the relief requested is not warranted.] NNP04-NB/DA/MG

Supreme Court logo
Case No: 40072
Supreme Court
Unpublished
Affirmed
Dec 5, 2003
477 days since filing.

Filed Order of Affirmance. "ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED." NNP04S-NB/MS/MG

Nginx
HTML 5
FacebookTwitter

©2025 Our Nevada Judges, Inc.

Terms & ConditionsVersion: 3.11.0Privacy Policy

An NRS Chapter 82  non-profit corporation. Recognized by the IRS as a Section 501(c)(3) organization.

YouTube
Comodo SSL
Angular