Anthony Cooper Pleads Guilty To Attempted Racketeering, State Agrees To Probation

Karlin Martinez, Chief Analyst

Jul 1, 2025, 9:00:00 AM

Anthony Cooper agreed to plead guilty to mid-level possession of a controlled substance and attempted racketeering, with eligibility for probation subject to the court's discretion. The State agreed to make no recommendation at sentencing, and all remaining counts were to be dismissed when Cooper was adjudged guilty and sentenced.

Salvador Ramirez and Casey Dunne Plead Guilty, State Waives Right To Argue At Sentencing

Karlin Martinez, Chief Analyst

May 21, 2025, 9:00:00 AM

Salvador Ramirez agreed to plead guilty to high-level possession of a controlled substance and attempted racketeering, with all remaining counts to be dismissed. The State agreed to make no sentencing recommendation and did not oppose concurrent sentences. The agreement was expressly contingent on co-defendant Casey Dunne accepting negotiations.

Grand Jury Indicts Motorcycle Club Members, District Court Judge Jasmin Lilly-Spells Orders Bail, Issues Arrest Warrants

Karlin Martinez, Chief Analyst

Sep 27, 2024, 9:00:00 AM

A Clark County Grand Jury returned a true bill charging multiple defendants, including Ethan Cintron and Nelson Cintron, authorizing prosecution for conspiracy to commit murder, attempted murder, assault with a deadly weapon, discharging a firearm into an occupied vehicle, racketeering, and related offenses. District Court Judge Jasmin Lilly-Spells ordered the superseding indictments filed and set Larry Johnson's bail at $20,000 after the State accused him of participating in a motorcycle club's criminal enterprise. Mr. Johnson's co-defendants include David Bryant Judd, Joshua Rios, Anthony T. Cooper, Casey Dunne, Salvador Ramirez, James Brooks, Christopher Ferguson, Dave Neubert, and Shaun Long.

District Court Judge Bita Yeager Finds LVMPD Reasonably Obtains Phones, Denies Petition

Karlin Martinez, Chief Analyst

Dec 15, 2023, 9:00:00 AM

District Court Judge Bita Yeager entered a written order denying the Cintrons' demand for the return of their seized cell phones, finding that exigent circumstances and probable cause justified the warrant seizure, concluding that LVMPD reasonably retained the phones during an ongoing criminal investigation and that any suppression issue was not ripe because the phones had not yet been searched. Stephen Stubbs, on behalf of the Cintrons, appealed the ruling to the Supreme Court, which ultimately dismissed the appeal because the requisite filing fee was not paid.

Judge Extends Evidentiary Proceedings, LVMPD Supplements Briefing

Karlin Martinez, Chief Analyst

Nov 14, 2023, 9:00:00 AM

District Court Judge Bita Yeager entered a minute order extending evidentiary proceedings and clarified that factual issues above and beyond body-worn camera footage would be considered in order to determine whether warrantless seizure and retention of property was consistent with NRS 179.085 or exigent circumstance precedent. LVMPD supplemented its opposition by submitting declarations authenticating body-worn camera footage that had been challenged by Petitioners. Petitioners objected to the supplement and moved to strike, arguing incomplete, irrelevant, and inadmissibly altered footage. District Court Judge Bita Yeager approved Our Nevada Judges, Inc.'s request to provide comprehensive electronic coverage of the proceedings.

In the Matter of Nelson Cintron, Event, 4 minutes, 38 seconds

19 0   785 views, 1 comments

Coverage will be provided from the Eighth Judicial District Court in the matter of Nelson Cintron. At issue is whether the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department seized property in violation of the Fourth Amendment. You can join as a member by clicking this link here: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJPb0hCUcufpuk7QhxVxwKA/join For inquiries, feel free to contact us through www.ournevadajudges.com

Cintron Urges Court To Suppress Information Obtained By Cell Phone, LVMPD Responds

Karlin Martinez, Chief Analyst

Oct 31, 2023, 9:00:00 AM

The Cintrons supplemented briefing alleging LVMPD unlawfully seized their cell phones without a warrant or consent and urged the return of their property. Their attorney, Stephen Stubbs, argued that any evidence obtained from the phones would be inadmissible under the fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine because the seizure violated the Fourth Amendment. LVMPD opposed, conceding phones were seized but arguing that they had not yet been searched, reiterating District Court Judge Joanna Kishner's role in mooting the issue due to her issuance of a warrant after seizure but before search had been executed.

,